Daniel Saks
Chief Executive Officer
If you're evaluating Unify for warm outbound, here is the direct answer: Unify pricing in 2026 starts at $1,740/month on the annual Growth plan (approximately $20,880 per year), with Pro and Enterprise tiers custom-quoted and requiring annual contracts. Unify does not publish list pricing for Pro or Enterprise; costs vary by credits, seats, and mailboxes. Those numbers are before you add seats, mailboxes, credit overages, or the tool stack most teams end up pairing with Unify to hit their pipeline targets.
This guide walks through every tier, the credit model, the real costs teams report after 12 months of usage, and the signals that indicate whether Unify is the right fit for your go-to-market motion or whether a different approach makes more sense.
Unify, marketed as Unify GTM, is a warm outbound platform co-founded by Austin Hughes (CEO) and Connor Heggie, with public sources indicating a launch around 2023. The company raised a $40M Series B led by Battery Ventures in July 2025, following a Series A that included Thrive Capital, Emergence, and the OpenAI Startup Fund.
The product combines three workflows that B2B teams typically buy separately:
Unify's customer roster includes Cursor, Perplexity, Flock Safety, Airwallex, and Together AI, primarily Series B–D software companies with mature RevOps functions. That customer profile is a useful signal for pricing: Unify is priced and packaged for teams with existing outbound programs, not first-time SDR org builds.
Three market shifts in 2025–2026 make Unify pricing worth understanding in detail before you sign.
Credit-based pricing (Clay, Unify, Apollo's usage-based plans) has replaced flat per-seat pricing as the dominant model for data-heavy platforms. Credits are flexible, but they make it structurally harder to forecast monthly spend when signal volume fluctuates, a common discussion point in G2 reviews.
B2B go-to-market teams are investing more in signal-based outbound tooling, but finance teams are also asking harder questions about signal-to-meeting conversion rates before renewals. Understanding Unify's true total cost of ownership (TCO) matters when you're defending the line item at budget time.
The category has narrowed from 40+ point solutions in 2023 to a handful of full-stack platforms in 2026. That means the tools still standing can command higher prices but it also means teams need to evaluate whether they're paying for a single-purpose tool inside a stack, or a true platform that replaces three or four line items. For broader context on how GTM teams are thinking about this shift, see Landbase's analysis of agentic AI in revenue operations.
Unify publishes three tiers on its pricing page. Here is what each one includes at list price.
The Growth plan is the only tier with published pricing and is designed for teams getting started with signal-based outbound.
Best fit: Teams of 1–3 SDRs running 1–2 targeted outbound Plays with moderate signal volume. Most teams outgrow Growth within 12 months if they have more than four reps or want to run more than three concurrent Plays.
Pro is where most mid-market GTM teams land. It unlocks enough credits and mailbox infrastructure to run multiple concurrent Plays across a broader ICP.
Best fit: Mid-market teams of 5–15 reps with an existing RevOps function, a defined ICP, and intent data signals flowing from multiple sources. Pro is not a self-serve tier; expect a sales cycle with security review.
Enterprise adds SSO, a dedicated Growth Consultant, and a substantially larger credit allocation.
Best fit: Enterprise GTM organizations with 15+ reps, compliance requirements (SOC 2, SAML SSO), and outbound programs already generating meaningful annual pipeline.
Unify's real cost depends heavily on how many reps you run on the platform and how much you exceed the included mailbox count. Below is an annualized view at list price, assuming standard usage patterns.
At 20+ reps, pricing becomes entirely a function of negotiated terms and typically includes multi-year commitments, committed credit consumption, and custom contract language.
Beyond the base subscription, there are several additional costs to budget for when deploying Unify. These are standard across enterprise GTM platforms but worth modeling explicitly.
The Unify platform costs alone base, seats, mailboxes, and credit overages compound meaningfully over three years before any ecosystem tools are added. Teams defending the full budget to finance should model the complete stack, not just the Unify contract value. For context on scaling pipeline without proportional headcount increases, see Landbase's resource on scaling B2B prospecting without increasing headcount.
If you are going to buy Unify, there are legitimate ways to reduce your first-year cost and protect yourself on renewal. These are standard B2B SaaS negotiation tactics.
Signal-triggered warm outbound platforms address one layer of the GTM stack but still require separate tools for list building, contact data, and execution at scale. The comparison below highlights where Unify sits relative to other platforms in the market.
What They Do: Landbase is an AI-native GTM platform that automates the end-to-end work of targeting, qualifying, and engaging accounts through agentic, multi-agent workflows. The platform combines a 300M+ verified B2B contact database, 1,500+ enrichment and signal fields, AI qualification, and multi-channel outreach execution in a single system, removing the need to stitch together separate prospecting, data, and sequencing tools.
Why They're Important: Landbase is the only platform that takes a team from a natural-language prompt to a verified, scored account list to a launched multi-channel campaign without switching tools. GTM-2 Omni, trained on 40M+ B2B campaigns and 175M+ sales conversations, continuously qualifies and prioritizes accounts across the full TAM. Customers report 4–7x higher conversion rates, with outcomes including $400K MRR added by P2 Telecom and 33% more meetings booked by Digo Media without additional headcount. Gartner recognized Landbase as a Cool Vendor 2025 in AI-driven GTM automation.
Key Stats / Metrics:
Leadership: CEO: Daniel Saks (co-founder, formerly co-CEO of AppDirect, Forbes 30 Under 30)
Founded: 2020
Recent Funding: Series A: $30M (January 2026) Investors: Picus Capital, 8VC, Sound Ventures
What They Do: Apollo.io provides an AI-powered platform combining sales intelligence, prospecting, and engagement capabilities in a single solution. The platform offers a large B2B contact database with AI-driven insights for identifying and engaging ideal prospects across multiple channels.
Why They're Important: Apollo.io offers an all-in-one platform combining prospecting, outreach, and analytics, making it a widely used option for teams seeking a consolidated engagement and data tool. The platform provides integrations with 50+ tools and a freemium entry point accessible to smaller teams.
Key Stats / Metrics:
Leadership: CEO: Tim Zheng
Founded: 2015
Recent Funding: Series D: $100M (August 2023) Valuation: $1.6B
What They Do: ZoomInfo provides deep enterprise intelligence with advanced features, including org charts, technographics, and buying signals. The platform specializes in comprehensive B2B data for large sales organizations with complex targeting requirements.
Why They're Important: ZoomInfo offers extensive enterprise intelligence with 321 million professional contacts and an integration ecosystem of 100+ tools. The platform excels at detailed company hierarchies and decision-maker mapping for enterprise teams pursuing complex, multi-stakeholder deals.
Key Stats / Metrics:
Leadership: CEO: Henry Schuck
Founded: 2000
Recent Funding: Public company (NASDAQ: ZI) IPO: June 2020
For go-to-market teams rethinking their outbound motion from the ground up, Landbase was purpose-built to address the core gap that signal-triggered warm outbound platforms leave unfilled: the intelligence, qualification, and activation work that requires a separate database, separate intent tool, and separate sequencing layer when using point solutions like Unify.
With Landbase, teams describe their ideal customer in plain English and receive a verified, AI-qualified audience list enriched across 1,500+ signal fields, ready for CRM sync and immediate campaign activation. The GTM-2 Omni agentic AI, trained on 40M+ B2B campaigns, handles targeting, scoring, enrichment, and multi-channel outreach coordination autonomously, reducing manual research effort by approximately 80%.
Unlike Unify's credit-based model that requires pairing with a separate contact database and intent data provider, Landbase consolidates the entire stack into one platform with predictable costs and no credit management overhead. The result is a system where machines handle the repetitive work so revenue teams can focus on building relationships and closing deals. See how Landbase works.
Unify's Growth plan starts at $1,740/month billed annually, which comes to approximately $20,880 per year, as published on Unify's pricing page. Pro and Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted and require annual contracts; Unify does not publish list pricing for these tiers, so costs vary by credits, seats, and mailboxes. Teams should model the full cost including seat expansion, mailbox expansion, credit overages, and any external intent data licenses before comparing against alternatives. The total annual spend for a mid-market team on Pro is typically well above the base contract value once all line items are factored in.
Unify offers an application-based free trial, currently advertised as 14 days, which interested teams can apply for on the Unify website. There is no self-serve free tier available in 2026; paid plans begin at the Growth tier. Evaluation for Pro and Enterprise typically happens through a sales-led process, with a paid commitment required to begin using the platform at scale. Teams with specific signal environments and RevOps resources are the best fit for a productive trial experience.
Every billable action in Unify draws from a shared credit pool allocated annually at each plan tier. Actions include company reveals, B2B email enrichment, phone number lookups, champion tracking events, new-hire alerts, and AI agent runs, each consuming credits at different rates depending on the action type. Credits are allocated annually and can be topped up when the allotment runs out, though add-on credit pack pricing is not published publicly. Teams with high signal volume or heavy phone enrichment usage should model credit consumption carefully before committing to a plan tier, as overages are a common source of cost variance after the first year.
The most significant additional costs beyond the base subscription are seat expansion ($100/seat/month on annual Pro and Enterprise), mailbox expansion ($25/mailbox/month), credit overages (typically 5–10% of base contract value), and the external tool stack that Unify does not replace. Most teams running Unify also pay separately for a primary contact database and a third-party intent data source, both of which carry their own annual licensing costs. Annual renewal increases are also standard in enterprise SaaS contracts; negotiating a renewal cap at signing is the most effective way to control multi-year spend. Modeling the full TCO across all these line items gives a far more accurate picture than the base subscription price alone.
Landbase takes a fundamentally different approach to the GTM stack. Rather than providing a signal-triggered warm outbound layer that teams must pair with a separate contact database, intent data provider, and engagement tool, Landbase combines all of these into a single agentic platform. Teams start with a natural-language prompt, receive a verified and AI-qualified audience enriched across 1,500+ signal fields, and launch multi-channel outreach without switching tools or managing per-credit costs. Customers report 4–7x higher conversion rates, making Landbase the stronger choice for teams that want end-to-end automation with predictable costs rather than a layered point-tool stack.
Tool and strategies modern teams need to help their companies grow.